Nava PBC
Paid Family and Medical Leave · Kickoff

Application Journey

Every round of corrections we prevent takes time off the applicant, time off the case worker, and a call out of the contact center. Improving the application process moves all three goals at once.
Overview
End to end journey: applicant lane on top, case worker lane below, rejection reason connecting them
R1 · weeks 1–6 · Applicant

Show what complete looks like

Applicants struggle with how much information they have to submit. We should make it clear with examples and at each specific step.
 Apply for paid leave
Medical leave for your own health condition
Here is everything you'll need. Gather it once and you won't be asked again.
1
A medical certification from your provider
Must be signed and dated by the provider. See an example of a complete one.
2
Your employer's name as it appears on your pay stub
Not the store or location name.
3
The dates you expect to be out
An estimate is fine. You can update it later.
Start my applicationSee a complete example
Why this is release one. It ships in six weeks, it costs the least, and it is the only thing here that prevents a correction instead of handling one.
R1 · weeks 1–6 · Applicant

Confirm exactly what arrived

A receipt closes the gap between sending something and hearing nothing. It is also the first honest instrumentation point we have.
 Application #48812
We received your application
Here is what came through. If something is missing, you can add it now.
Application details
Received today, 2:14pm
Medical certification
certification.pdf
Employer response
We'll request this from your employer. Nothing for you to do.
R2 · months 2–3 · Case worker

One case, one screen

Case workers must reconcile conflicting information from applicants and employers. Today that means three places. This is one.
 Case #48812 · Medical leave
Application
Leave type: Medical
Dates: Mar 3 – Apr 28
Employer: Ridgeline Foods
Employer response
Confirmed employed
Wages on file
Dates: Mar 3 – Apr 28
Certification
Provider: Dr. A. Nunez
Condition documented
Not signed
Dates match across all three. One item needs attention.
R2 · months 2–3 · Case worker

One item at a time

Every path acts on the item. Accept it, reject it with a reason, or send it to someone with the authority to decide. Nothing gets set aside with nobody owning it.
 Case #48812 · Evidence 3 of 3
Application details
Accepted
Employer response
Accepted
Medical certification
Correct form, complete, provider signature missing on page 2
AcceptReject with a reasonSend to a supervisor
R2 → R3 · Case worker

The reason is a short list. The note is for when the list isn't enough.

A case worker makes the judgment call from a standard set of configured reasons, which triggers a notification and fix-it instructions to the applicant.
 Reject: Medical certification
Wrong form for this leave type
Dates don't match the application
Certification incomplete
Selected
Unreadable or cut off
Add a note (optional)
The form is correct and filled out. Your provider just needs to sign page 2.
Send
Why the note matters. The reason code alone would say "certification incomplete," and this applicant would think they need a whole new appointment. Twelve words of a human's judgment save a doctor visit.
R3 · months 4–5 · Applicant

One message, one thing to do

The applicant gets a specific message about resolving their rejection instead of a blanket rejection that dead ends.
 Message about application #48812
We need one thing to keep going
Your medical certification is missing a signature.
Medical certification
The form is correct and filled out. Your provider just needs to sign page 2.
Here is an example of a signed certification. Send the signed page and you keep your place in line.
Replace medical certification
R3 · months 4–5 · Applicant

Status that says what happens next, and who it's waiting on

"In review" deflects a phone call. "Waiting on you, since Tuesday" changes the outcome.
 Application #48812
We received your application
Mar 1
Your employer responded
Mar 3
Waiting on you
A signature on your medical certification. Nothing else is holding this up.
Decision
Usually within 10 business days of receiving everything
R4 · month 6 · Applicant

Fix that one item. Don't start over.

This is the release that removes the penalty for needing a second try, and the one most likely to turn into a policy conversation instead of software.
 Application #48812 · Replace one document
Application details
Unchanged
Employer response
Unchanged
Medical certification, signed
Replaced just now. Everything else stays as it was.
You keep your place in line. Your application goes back to the same reviewer, not to the end of the queue.
Assumption: A case worker can accept a corrected document without redoing the whole review. That is a policy question more than a technical one, and it's one of the first things I'd want to confirm.
R4 · month 6 · Case worker

Come back to a clean case

Rejected items stay attached to the case. They just leave the default view, so nobody reads the same wrong document three times.
 Case #48812 · Ready for decision
Application details
Employer response
Medical certification, signed
1 superseded document hidden. Show history
ApproveDeny
Over time

Standard reasons can be counted

That shows which problems are most common, and which are worth fixing at the source.
 Rejection reasons · last 90 days
ReasonShareWhat it suggests
Certification incomplete (unsigned)41%The form doesn't make the signature obvious
Wrong form for this leave type19%The requirements page is unclear
Dates don't match the application16%Possibly a real conflict, worth research
Unreadable or cut off11%Upload guidance
Everything else13%
Four in ten rejections are one fixable thing. We improve the form instructions instead of repeating the same rejection.
Metrics

What each release should move

These are estimated targets. We'll set real baselines in the first four weeks and revise these targets.
ReleaseWhat shipsWhat should moveProgram goal
R1Requirements up front, submission receipt20% less median time to finish an applicationApplicant time
R2One case view, evidence review with reasons20% less median handling time per caseStaff time
R3Specific notices, status that names the next step30% fewer status calls per 100 applicationsOperating cost
R4Correction without restartingRounds of correction cut to half the baselineAll three
Watch every release: Where applicants stop and don't come back. Corrections per application also falls when people give up, so we need to track abandonment to ensure we've fixed the problem instead of moving it.
Where I'd start

The first four weeks

1
Sit with case workers. Not interviews. Watch the queue on a normal Tuesday.
2
Pull the denial and correction data. The reason list should come from what actually fails here, not from what I guessed.
3
Measure where applicants stop. Nobody has that number today, and without it we can't tell whether R4 fixed the problem or just moved it.
4
Confirm one policy question. Can a corrected document be accepted without redoing the whole review?
On employers: they're not in this six months, but how fast they respond affects how long a decision takes. If everything else improves and that number doesn't, employers are the bottleneck and they go first next.

Independent concept work by Kevin Middleton. Not affiliated with, endorsed by, or commissioned by Nava PBC. All trademarks and product imagery belong to their respective owners.